Title: Triage
Author: Louise Blaydon
Cover Artist: L.C. Chase
Publisher: Dreamspinner Press
Buy link:
Genre: Contemporary M/M/M
Length: Novella (98 pages)
Rating: 4 stars out of 5

A Guest Review by jeayci

Review Summary: A wonderful friends-to-lovers ménage story with more narration and less dialogue than I prefer.

Blurb: When Christian first meets Jordan and Ezra, they’re all young and lucky, thrown together in a journalist internship that cements their friendship for life. But when the internship ends, everything falls apart.

Christian has always loved Jordan, though he’s sure he doesn’t have a chance. By Jordan’s wedding, Christian has feelings for Ezra too. Then Ezra leaves on a foreign assignment, and Christian resigns himself to loneliness and concentrates on his job.

But his professional success comes with crushing personal blows. When an accident kills Jordan’s wife, Christian becomes Jordan’s only support. Months spent so close to him take their toll on Christian’s heart. Then Ezra finally comes home and Christian realizes he has to make a choice: give up on both of them and try to move on… or take a chance that’s risky, crazy—and his only shot.

Review: If you enjoy friends-to-lovers stories and don’t mind menages, then this is the book for you. I don’t have a big thing about menages either way, except that I don’t always find them believable as HEA material. The characters in this book shared my concerns, which helped make their ultimate resolution and HEA more believable to me. When one character says people don’t live in ménages à trois, another replies that they do and points out, “Hence the existence of the term, really, as opposed to ‘wild drunken threeway’. Ménage: ‘household’.”

And they are a household. Christian and Jordan lived together for years after the death of Jordan’s wife, in what Christian described as basically a sexless marriage. If Christian was attracted to his straight friend, well, that was his problem and nothing to bother Jordan about. When Ezra returns, the three of them pick up their friendship as if they’d last seen each other yesterday. And he’s at the house so much he practically lives there. So all the way around we see solid friendships.

I liked all of the characters individually and together, in each combination of twosomes and as a threesome. I even learned a new word: tessellating (from to form of small squares or blocks, as floors or pavements; form or arrange in a checkered or mosaic pattern.). So why didn’t I rate this five stars? I had a few issues with it that interfered with my ability to stay in the story.

The majority of the first twenty percent was almost entirely narrative, with very little dialogue. It was well-written and engaging narrative, so I didn’t even really notice for the first ten percent or so. But after a while it became noticeable because there was so darn much of it; I really wanted to see the characters interact rather than just be told what happened over the course of years. Around twenty percent they finally started talking to each other, but it seemed like it continued to be a bit heavy on the narration even after that. And I didn’t really understand why we needed to have a flashback in the middle, rather than just progressing from early years to later ones.

There was also a point when Christian and Jordan got dogs, and Christian observed that “when he and Jordan both had to work almost to midnight, it didn’t have that edge of the tomb when they opened the door on the dark.” I noticed something that would never have occurred to me before I got a dog: if they’re gone til midnight, when do those poor dogs get to go potty or for a walk? I found myself searching for mention of a yard, at least, but found none. And then I forgot about the dogs, as they weren’t mentioned again. I’d also have liked a little more explanation about Jordan’s sexuality and how he went from apparently straight to in bed with his best (male) friends.

But despite those niggles, I loved this story. When there was finally dialogue, it was wonderful and often made me laugh out loud. It was also frequently quite touching, and I’d think “awwww” as I read. Sometimes the laughter and the “awwww” were simultaneous. I loved the consideration the characters had for each other and the ways they looked out for each other, and teased each other, and overall complemented each other. There were times they were awkward together and I feared it was the setup for a Big Misunderstanding, but each time they actually gasp talked to each other and resolved things right away.

And when the three finally end up in bed together? I thought my ereader was going to burst into flames! But their compatibility in the bedroom was clearly an extension of their compatibility and comfort with each other out of it. And that made their HEA both desirable and believable to me. I highly recommend this story to anyone who doesn’t mind a bit too much well-written exposition.



  • I really liked this book. I thought it could have been longer, because I thought the M.C.’s were worth spending more time with! I agree that the narration got old. I would have enjoyed more in the moment interactions, rather than reading about them secondhand,so to speak! That being said, I was still happy with it.

  • I need an Add-on App so I can just add these books to my Goodreads account without having to switchover and search. :forit:

  • Great review,jeayci, I laughed out loud myself. 🙂

    I’ll put this on my list for when I’m craving a good menage.


  • Thank for the review, I’ve had my eye on this book. Have read and like the author before, a ‘ho for good characterizations and plot…narriation usually gets on my nerves (along with the dogs).

    My enjoyment of menage will probably win over the annoyance factors for this one :reading1:

    • This book has great characterizations, so along with your enjoyment of menage it seems likely you’d enjoy it. Especially if you’ve read and liked the author before. Please let me know what you think! 🙂

  • I absolutely loved this book because of the characterizations. As I have said many times, even though I love a plotty book, good characterization wins me over every time. This book had three wonderful MCs in Christian, Jordan and Ezra and this is one of the most believable M/M/M stories I have read recently.

    I think all the narrative in the first 20% of the book might have had to do with its length (98 pages), which is always a problem with novellas, as authors try to stuff as much information as they can into their books to fit within the publisher’s guidelines. Since these guys have a lot of history because they have known each other for a long time I suppose it was difficult to fit all that living into a dialogue heavy book, as there is so much to tell about their background and early relationship. However, you made an excellent point.

    As for the dogs, I noticed that they were never walked and I wondered WTF? Having said that though, I enjoyed these guys and their relationship rocked – they were true friends before they became lovers. Also, as you said, the sex was out of the world hot. 🙂 I definitely believed in their HEA.

    Great job on the review Jess.

    • even though I love a plotty book, good characterization wins me over every time

      :forit: I agree completely! 😀 And yes, this book had wonderful characters.

      I really wondered if she’d done a linear progression instead of the flashback, if we could have gotten the same information without the extra narration. She could have shown us vignettes of them interacting over the years, so we could “live” it with them and get a sense of it for ourselves. I don’t think that would have required any additional length, and I think it would have worked better for me. But maybe I’m just weird? :crazy04:

      • No, you’re not weird. 😮 A linear progression could have worked better in this case. As many authors do they choose the easiest approach when writing their stories.

        She has written a few other books that I have reviewed although I think those are mostly paranormal. She does like the short form.

        • I’ve read a couple other contemporaries by her, but I don’t think I’ve read any paranormal. I enjoy her writing style. 🙂

  • I like this writer and while I am a tough sell on menages, it is because I have read very few convincing ones (what you ssaid basically :)), but some I loved, so sold :). Thanks.


Please comment! We'd love to hear from you.

%d bloggers like this: