The Queen’s Librarian

18168993Title: The Queen’s Librarian
Author: Carole Cummings
Cover Artist: Paul Richmond
Publisher: Dreamspinner Press
Buy Links: Genre: Humor, Fantasy
Length: Novel (224 pages)
Rating: 3.25 stars out of 5

A Guest Review by LenaLena

Review Summary: Light and funny. A bit too much so, if you ask me.


All Lucas Tripp wants is prosperity for the tenants of his family’s estate; good weather for the harvest; suitable matches for his sisters; a little money left over at the end of the month; and more quality time with his boyfriend, Alex Booker. That’s not so much to ask for, right?

Wrong. When his sister’s new suitor suddenly disappears, Lucas is drawn into an adventure of a lifetime—kicking and screaming all the way. Magical beings who were allegedly banished hundreds of years ago are coming through portals that were supposed to be shut against them—and that’s only part of Lucas’s problem. The rest consists of missing princes, breaking and entering, suspicious magicians, well-meaning women who are far too interested in Lucas’s sex life… the list goes on. Lucas is decidedly Not Amused, but he’ll get over it someday. Probably. After all, there’s always Alex.


If you’ve read any Carole Cummings before you’re probably expecting anguished MCs and meddling Gods. She’s written 7 books about those (The Aisling series and Wolf’s Own) and written them well. I enjoyed the hell out of those, anyway. But apparently her heroes are so tortured, even Carole Cummings herself needs a break from them, at least that what it says in the acknowledgments: ‘And I suppose a (grudging) thanks to Fen, because if it hadn’t been for the bleak despair that is his headspace, I would never have needed Lucas and Alex to brighten up the path away from his angsty abyss.’ And so the Queen’s Librarian was born.

And, indeed, Lucas couldn’t be more different than Wil and Fen and the story couldn’t be lighter, without ending up weightless. We see a writer having fun here and if you are in the mood for something light an fun you could have a winner. Lucas is a good character with lots of internal monologue that mostly revolves either around the things he worries about or the way people (including himself) see him and how accurate (or not) their views are. Alex is a little less defined, probably because Lucas’s is the only POV. That doesn’t mean he is vague or cardboardy, he has some of the best lines, really. Especially when ‘conversing’ with Lucas’s cousin Laurie, who happens to be a prince. And obnoxious. Most people in this book are obnoxious in one way or another, just like they should be in a good farce.

Lucas and Alex have an established relationship, so if you are looking for the fluttering butterflies of love’s first touch, you’re not going to find them here. That said, they are an adorable couple, so it’s not like there is a lack of fluttering in the book. What is not fluttering is the ‘rosebud’, because there is no on page sex. (And I would like to think that if Cummings did write sex, she would never use ‘fluttering’ or ‘rosebud’, let alone use them together.) The story itself has a plot that mostly happens off page too. Lucas, Alex and Laurie do some exploring, but compared to the complexity of the world hinted at beyond the pages and the depths of the plot that is only referred to in conversation, what actually happens on page is quite mundane. Even so, Lucas is all aflutter about what does happen and spends most of the book skirting hysteria.

As much as I liked the story and the characters, that is what wore me down in the end. Lucas’s internal monologue was funny. The first 30% of the book or so for sure, even if it was a mite contrived. That was easily overlooked then. But after that it got distracting, because the plot finally kicked in and Lucas was still going on and on and on in his head. Around 70% or so it became irritating, because the babbling just. didn’t. stop.

“Alex looked at Lucas in such a way that, if he didn’t know better, Lucas would suspect perhaps he was unwittingly doing a rather excellent impression of a gaping fish. Not that Lucas was. Doing an impression. Because Lucas didn’t do such things. Impressions. But if he did do impressions, he was sure they would be excellent. Hence the “excellent impression” part. All right, wow. Perhaps Lucas had taken an inadvertent bite out of that crazy-cake.”

My impression is that the book was written in installments and would actually work better if it was read in installments, so the reader gets smaller doses of the over the top humor. Read in one go, it was too much. At least for me. But humor is something that differs wildly from person to person and I would not be at all surprised if many of you, who are in the mood for a light an funny read, enjoy it from beginning to end, and I really hope you do. And then again some of you may burn out on it even earlier than I did….

Personally, I hope Cummings is planning more stories with tortured heroes and fickle gods, because apparently those work better for me.



  • I really enjoyed this one – it hit me just the right way for light sweet humor. I can imagine you have to be in the mood for that, though. A good choice after somone (Carole, I’m looking at you) rips your heart out with anguished characters. It’s on my comfort-rereads shelf.

  • I would like to think that if Cummings did write sex, she would never use ‘fluttering’ or ‘rosebud’, let alone use them together

    You are absolutely right! I always bemoan the fact that she rarely chooses to write on-page sex because when she does – it’s scorching. Again, not explicit but scorching. Read Impromptu. Just sayin’.

    Thank you for the review. When I need something light, I know what to pick up. I might not be too overwhelmed by Lucas. After all, I love Harry Dresden. 😀


Please comment! We'd love to hear from you.

%d bloggers like this: