This Rough Magic (A Shot in the Dark #1)

Title: This Rough Magic
Author: Josh Lanyon
Cover Artist: April Martinez
Publisher: JustJoshin
Buy link: Amazon.com (Second Edition)
Genre: Historical M/M ’30s, Mystery
Length: Novel/45K words
Rating: 3.5 stars out of 5

A dueling guest review by Jeff Pearce

Review Summary: An intriguing debut for a series that could use better characterization and bolder departure from the noir genre’s stock attributes.

THE BLURB:

Wealthy San Francisco playboy Brett Sheridan thinks he knows the score when he hires tough guy private eye Neil Patrick Rafferty to find a priceless stolen folio of Shakespeare’s The Tempest. Brett’s convinced his partner-in-crime sister is behind the theft — a theft that’s liable to bring more scandal to their eccentric family, and cost Brett his marriage to society heiress Juliet Lennox. What Brett doesn’t count on is the instant and powerful attraction that flares between him and Rafferty.
Once before, Brett took a chance on loving a man, only to find himself betrayed and broken. This time around there’s too much at risk. But as the Bard himself would say, Journey’s end in lovers meeting.

THE REVIEW:

I was cleaning my .45 Smith & Wesson to a buff shine when Wave asked me to do this review. She walked into my office, an explosion of high heels and lipstick. Her hips waved a happy hello…

Well, no, she didn’t, but the above (half ripped off from Mickey Spillaine) sort of sums up the challenge of writing anything in a gay noir vein. Even casual lines can push a sincere work into pastiche. All those slanted fedoras on the heads of tough guy private dicks and mobsters. And Josh Lanyon has set himself a very high bar indeed, billing This Rough Magic as the first book in a “new lightly comic mystery series set in 1930s San Francisco” which is his take on The Thin Man films.

So to review a short novel like this means addressing two separate issues. One, does it do what it sets out to do, i.e. live up to the spirit of the mysteries it’s emulating? And Two, is it an enjoyable read for its own sake?

I don’t how many readers give a damn about Issue One. Maybe they do, maybe they don’t. I’m a fan of the Thin Man films, hardboiled detectives and everything 1930s, so to me, it’s an incredibly cool concept that prompted me to rush out to read his novel. And if Josh Lanyon is going to bill his work in that lofty company, we should explore the question.

First, for those who don’t know the Thin Man films, let alone the original novel, they’re great fun. Dashiell Hammett made a departure from his Sam Spade and Continental Op thrillers for a more lighthearted mystery featuring Nick and Nora Charles. Nick is a retired PI who’s clever and drinks. Nora’s a wealthy socialite—who also drinks, though not nearly as much as Nick. The films were huge successes because of the great chemistry and witty dialogue given to William Powell and Myrna Loy, and every wisecracking adventure couple from Hart to Hart to Mr. and Mrs. Smith owes to this inspiration.

So This Rough Magic and its resulting books will all hinge on the relationship between Lanyon’s gay sleuths stepping in for the husband and wife roles.

Alas, the two heroes show a lot of potential, but they’re not quite focussed in their debut. Brett Sheridan is likeable enough as the wealthy playboy closet case, and we can see he’s got that endearing streak of quiet courage that will make him invaluable to his more experienced private eye lover. Rafferty is more of the problem and a puzzle. Lanyon seems to have modelled him too closely on the typical hardboiled detective prototype than the witty, semi-retired Nick Charles. Like the fedora-wearing cliché, he’s got rough features and he drinks; it’s hardly a surprise to learn he’s Irish or that he grew up in an orphanage. Even when Rafferty casually spouts a bit of triva on how deer attack more humans than bears, explaining, “I like to read…. I’m a naturally curious fellow,” this sounds like vintage Philip Marlowe, brooding over his chessboard problems.

The over-faithfulness, for lack of a better way to put it, carries over into the storytelling with mixed results. Early on, when we follow Brett, the narrative is either neutral or sounds like F. Scott Fitzgerald dashing off a quick family tableau scene for The Saturday Evening Post. When we follow Rafferty, we often shift into Raymond Chandler gear. Sometimes it’s as smartass brilliant as anything Chandler could tap out. For instance: “After a calculated interval, a butler who looked like a close relative of Bela Lugosi came to the door and inquired, in a high-hat British accent, what Rafferty required. Rafferty required an audience with that man of affairs, William Lennox. Dracula regretted that Mr. Lennox was not available.”

This is great stuff, but the pity is that all the cleverness is in the narrative when what we’ve been sold is the idea of a gay Nick and Nora—sorry, Nick and Nick. Where’s the clever repartee? The first sparkle in any banter between them pops up in the last third of the book when a drunken Brett is questioning Rafferty:

“You’re a foundling?”
“I was. Technically, I think I’m too old now days.”

More moments like this, please. If it sounds like asking too much, consider that for a master storyteller like Lanyon, after a decade of successful m/m fiction, we have to move the goal posts. There are some genuine flashes of storytelling brilliance, and he’s at his best when he almost completely forgets the time period. Writing anything set in a different era is hard—you have to drop your reader into the decade without constantly drawing undue attention to it, which can paradoxically yank your reader right out. The problem is that even the 1930s weren’t like the 1930s, certainly not the machine-gun toting, quaint slang version that’s been recycled down to us through movies and TV shows until it’s a shadow of itself.

Lanyon is at his best when he practices restraint. A clearly well researched Coca-Cola ad dings the right bell, but when high society playboys use a term like ‘gat’ (which no one in the decade ever really used anyway), ehhhhh…. There’s the sound of tin. Later, an Asian character is referred to as “The Oriental.” I get that this is for authenticity of voice, and I’m no fan of political correctness, but there are times when it would be good to sacrifice the verisimilitude for more elegant, modern phrasing.

So Lanyon has to decide whether he wants his series to conjure up our cliché ideas of the hardboiled detectives of fiction or break new ground to plant his characters in richer, more authentic and interesting soil. For instance, his two lovers exist in a kind of vacuum of loneliness, as if they’re the only two gay guys in Frisco, and no doubt, real homosexuals back then probably often felt like that. But wouldn’t it be great for Lanyon to explore the noirish queer subculture that must have slowly percolated in the city with all its potential for blackmail schemes and double-crosses?

True, just because it’s m/m romance doesn’t mean the plot has to focus on gay issues. But a stolen Shakespeare folio, while fun, was a plot we could expect from any detective story, and as mentioned earlier, there’s hardly any fun dialogue. The tone is closer to sipped Scotch in a dive bar than bubbly champagne at a high society party (where the sleuthing Charles couple would go). With that kind of dark and lonely tone, let’s change out of the tuxedo altogether and hit the dark alleys.

Again, how much any of this matters to the reader depends on whether they’ve picked up the novel based on his pitch over the era or just to have a fun read with no expectations. Is it a fun read? Definitely, even with the sketchy characters. Lanyon’s many die-hard fans who are on auto-buy won’t be disappointed. But for the rest of us, it’s somewhat annoying that key suspects are “off screen” for so long, only to be reintroduced pages and pages later when they’re summoned for the solution. Brett and Rafferty prove to be equally clever, which bodes well for their future cases. Do we give a damn about who stole the Shakespeare folio? Not really—and it’s just as well. There’s a great story of how the moviemakers for The Big Sleep in 1939, weighed down by the twisting, complicated plot, realized that one murder in the novel didn’t make any sense and cabled Raymond Chandler to ask who killed that particular guy. Chandler cabled back something like, “I have no idea.”

The case is less important than our heroes, and while Josh Lanyon hasn’t given us a new Nick and Nick Charles yet, he might give us a great gay Marlowe and sidekick in book two and three. If he doesn’t quite pull it off, they’ll still be fun reads, and he should be commended for trying.

So don’t sweat this review, buddy. Take your finger off the trigger of that .45 and have a drink. Just forget it, pal. It’s Chinatown.

Recommended

Author

Jeff Pearce is the author of Dragon Streets from Dreamspinner Press and Buddha on the Road from Gallivant Books.

33 comments

  • 3.5? I have to disagree with this review. I curled up with this book last evening and couldn’t put it down. Witty dialogue, quirky characters, great setting, tenderness, protectiveness, good plot and a story that wasn’t bogged down in sex scenes every second page. Loved these guys, and I can’t wait to find out what happens next.

    Reply
  • There were some interesting thoughts here but I couldn’t really connect with your review. It felt to me like you were trying a bit too hard to sound funny and witty and, like some kind of expert of the genre, tell the author how a book like this should have been done. It was more about your knowledge and expectations than about the book.

    “Later, an Asian character is referred to as “The Oriental.” I get that this is for authenticity of voice, and I’m no fan of political correctness, but there are times when it would be good to sacrifice the verisimilitude for more elegant, modern phrasing.”

    I just don’t get this. If you’re not a fan of political correctness why do you need a “more elegant, modern phrasing”, especially if you’re reading a historical book? Wouldn’t you want it to stay true to the era? Anyway, I think it was tastefully done here.

    I really enjoyed this book and I’m looking forward to the next in the series. 🙂

    Reply
  • Jeff, great review. I like the dueling reviews as well. What a great way to mix things up!
    Wave’s hips waved a happy hello?
    What imagery!
    I enjoyed this novel, its a JL, I havent read anything of his..yet, that Ive disliked.(No, I havent read them all). Im working on it.

    Reply
  • Oh what an awesome review Jeff, thank you. I *am* Josh Lanyon’s fan and his books are autobuy for me, but I have to admit that this one did not work for me even as simple piece of entertainment. I most certainly have not had any preconceived expectations of this book, but I just wanted more of everything – more of a funny dialog, more about the characters, I definitely agree that they are just sketched and the villain’s reveal came so out of the left field for me. I had no idea that this is a first one in the series though, hopefully characters will have more depth in the next book. Am looking forward to th4e next one.

    Reply
  • Fascinating review, Jeff. Thanks.

    I have to confess, I read up to the first scene with Brett and his sister last week or two weeks ago. Haven’t picked it up since. I know my mood has been off lately, but it just wasn’t working for me. I really need the light-hearted banter right now.

    Reply
    • Buda

      I really need the light-hearted banter right now.

      I’m reading something with lighthearted banter right now. If you like K.A. Mitchell you will love her latest. Oh I forgot, it doesn’t release for a couple of weeks. 😀

      Reply
  • I’m still stuck on picturing Wave’s hips waving a happy hello! Excellent imagery!!! :wave:

    I will most likely get this as I do enjoy this author’s writing style…..but it didn’t immediately pull me in when I read the blurb or excerpt. I figure it was because of the era; not my favorite setting for a story.

    Great review, thank you, Jeff!

    Reply
  • Question for the spoiler lovers (like me). Does Brett marry his “girlfriend” or is that one of the threads left hanging? (Plus, does she know her fiancee is gay?)

    I need to know these things before I read. 🙂 (You can email me if you don’t want to post it here).

    Reply
    • Can’t bring myself to offer any spoilers. I always feel that’s unfair to the writer and to the book. Suffice to say JL makes it interesting enough that I think if you like his other books and can get into this one, you’ll certainly want to stick around for future novels in the series.

      Reply
    • I can I can Lasha :), I love spoilers and so happy if somebody else wants to know them – so FEW people do lol, most usually get annoyed with me for wanting to share 🙂

      Seriously, if you want to email me privately, will be more than happy to share.

      Reply
  • I agree with part of your review – the part about characters that didn’t quite lived up to their potential. I am also inclined to agree with the rating. In fact, I said at GR that I was stuck between 3 and 4 stars and I went with four but reserved the right to change it after rereading the book.

    My other complaints are similar to Saga’s (see above). The beginning was awesome and then… it didn’t quite go where it promised in both mystery and romance departments. I knew that this is beginning of the series, but I was still miffed that the story lines left dangling (for the future sequels) were more interesting than the mystery in this one.

    Thank you for the review. Now I can’t let that image of Wave out of my head. 😀

    Reply

Please comment! We'd love to hear from you.

%d bloggers like this: